International Laboratory for Evaluation of Practices and Innovations in Education

 

Promoting an evidence-based approach to the use of EdTech in education and researching the digital divide

 



EVALUATE

the effectiveness of educational innovations and practices

RESEARCH

student and teacher engagement with educational technologies

STUDY

patterns of EdTech usage through digital traces

ENGAGE

international think tanks and scholars in the evaluation of educational innovations

Topic Map of Our Studies




Areas of Expertise

  • WE CONSULT

    business companies, schools, and organizations on issues

  • WE EVALUATE

    the effectiveness of educational interventions on the learning experience of students on online platforms

  • WE CONDUCT

    full-cycle research: goal setting, design, measurement instrument development, data collection and processing 

    Find more about our lab in the presentation

Research Projects

Implementation, Usage and Perception of Digital Technologies in Schools

We analysed the dynamics of digital inequality in Russia during educational reforms aimed to improve the quality and equity of education system, as well as during the COVID-19 pandemic-related transition to distance learning. We studied teacher practices related to the use of digital technologies, and looked into the relationships between these practices and the characteristics of teachers and schools. Finally, we made an assessment of teacher burnout and teachers’ technology-related stress during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. 

The Case of New Moscow: A Natural Experiment

We assessed the effect of the ‘Stolichnoye obrazovanie’ (‘Education in the capital) programme on ‘New Moscow’ students’ academic achievement and their access to educational resources. We also performed an analysis of the collateral factors affecting academic achievement and the scope of resources (inputs and infrastructure) available to schools. As a result, we proposed recommendations aimed at reducing educational inequality in Russia.

Factors and Barriers of Digital Technology Use in Schools

In this project, we studied the factors that determine how primary school teachers react to the implementation of digital technologies in schools and how they actually use them. We investigated the relationships between teachers’ behaviours towards the use of digital technologies and their characteristics, and complemented this analysis with a study of the effects of school environments on teachers’ use of such technologies. We also identified the mechanisms and factors behind the teachers’ behaviours.

Commercial Projects

Measuring Student Engagement on Digital Educational Platforms

Together with the educational platform Uchi.ru, we conducted a comprehensive study of approaches to the assessment and measurement of student engagement with digital educational platforms for children. We developed an experimental design (RCT) which can be used to assess the effectiveness of various mechanics for student engagement.

Collaborate with us

lepa@hse.ru

akapuza@hse.ru

Involvement in Educational Programmes

Evidence-based Education Development / Data Analysis in Education)

In this programme, students learn how to develop informed solutions related to educational policy, business, and science based on data and the latest theories. Students gain an understanding of the economics of educational products and management principles.

2 years, Full-time programme (in Russian)

More details

EdTech Practices

In this course, students are introduced to the practical aspects of EdTech research and the foundations of online educational experiences.

Elective course for HSE students

More details

Science of Learning and Assessment / Quasi-Experimental Research in Education

This programme is aimed at developing assessment instruments that take into account individual personality features.

2 years, Full-time programme

More details

Graduate School of Education / Methods of experimental studies in education

We conduct practical and fundamental research into education based on an interdisciplinary approach.

More details

Our Team

Laboratory Head

Evgeniy Terentev

International Laboratory of Research and Design In E-learning: Senior Researcher

Research Staff

Anastasia Kapuza

Self-regulated learning, methodology for analysing and using digital traces

Kseniya Adamovich

Using AI and ML-based tools in education research, learning patterns in online environments

Jamie Costley

Instructional design in online environments, collaborative learning

Anna Gorbunova

Instructional design, cognitive load, problem-oriented learning

Galina Shulgina

Computer-supported collaborative learning, providing feedback in online learning

Aleksandra Getman

Engagement, learning analytics, instructional design in online learning

Maxim Boitcov

Self-regulated learning, methodology for analysing and using digital traces

Han Zhang

Computer-supported collaborative learning, providing feedback in online learning

Anastasiia Guliaeva

Learning engagement, DGBL

Publications

  • Book

    Higher Education in Federal Countries: A Comparative Study

    Higher Education in Federal Countries: A Comparative Study is a unique study of higher education in nine federal countries—the United States, Canada, Australia, Germany, Mexico, Brazil, Russia, China and India. In this book, leading international scholars discuss the role of federalism and how it shapes higher education in major nation-state actors on the world stage. The editors develop an overarching comparative analysis of the dynamics of central and regional power in higher education, and the national case studies explain how each federal and federal-like higher education system has evolved and how it functions in what are highly varied contexts.  

    The book makes a major contribution to higher education studies and defines a new field of comparative analysis. It also provides important insights into comparative governance and the study of federalism and federal arrangements, with their particular historical, political, legal and economic dimensions.

    L.: Sage, 2018.

  • Article

    Terentev E., Shcheglova I., Federiakin D. et al.

    Active versus Passive Teaching: Students’ Perceptions and Thinking Skills

    Most studies show that active teaching approaches positively affect student development when compared to passive teaching approaches. However, the literature is still unclear if an active teaching approach is more effective in all circumstances. This is because some studies find no differences in learning gains between the two approaches. Therefore, this study looks at how different levels of knowledge from Bloom’s taxonomy are affected by the active versus passive teaching approach. The research was conducted with a group of students of economics and management. A validated standardized instrument to assess microeconomic and macroeconomic competencies (TUCE Test) allows us to model added value to the following cognitive levels: knowledge and understanding, explicit application, and implicit application. The cognitive levels are constructed in accordance with a revised version of Bloom’s taxonomy. The results show that the active teaching approach is positively linked to academic performance at two cognitive levels: recognition and understanding and explicit understanding, with no significant relationship at the level of implicit understanding. On the other hand, a passive teaching approach has a negative relationship with academic outcomes at all the three cognitive levels.

    Educational studies. 2024. Vol. 1. No. 3. P. 129-150.

  • Book chapter

    Lysova-Golomzina E., Kapuza A.

    VALIDATION OF THRESHOLD CONCEPTS IN CASE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AT MIDDLE SCHOOL USING CONCEPT MAPS

    In bk.: 16th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Palma, Spain. 1-3 July, 2024. EDULEARN24 Proceedings. IATED, 2024. P. 2290-2295.

  • Working paper

    Larina G., Kuzmina Y., Georgijs K.

    The Precision of Symbolic Numerical Representation in Verbal Format Has an Indirect Effect on Math Performance in First Grade

    Numerical information can be represented in three formats: two symbolic (visual (digits) and verbal (number words)) and one nonsymbolic (analog) format. Studies have shown that the precision of symbolic numerical representation is associated with math performance. The precision of symbolic representation is mostly discussed as the precision of representation in a visual format, whereas the precision of representation in verbal format and its relation with math performance is less studied. The current study examines the precision of symbolic numerical representation in visual and verbal formats and the relationship between such precision and math performance when controlling for prior math performance, nonsymbolic numerical representation, phonological processing, reading skills and working memory. We used data from 367 Russian first graders (mean age, 7.6 years; 53% girls). To assess the precision of symbolic numerical representation, magnitude comparison tasks with digits and number words were used. It was found that the precision of symbolic representation in verbal format did not have a direct effect on math performance, but has an indirect effect via visual format of symbolic representation, even when controlling for prior math performance and other cognitive abilities.

    PSYCHOLOGY. WP BRP. Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ, 2020. No. 120.

All publications