The HSE Institute of Education is a leading interdisciplinary research centre specialising in the study of education systems, policies and practices. With a faculty of over 250 researchers and educators, including internationally renowned scholars, the Institute is a hub for high-impact research, teaching and policy engagement in education.
As part of its Strategy 2030, the Institute is developing into a world-class research school, focusing on understanding educational development and assessing the impact of educational policies. These priorities are reflected in the Institute’s key areas:
— Artificial Intelligence in Education
— Well-being in Education
— Education and the Labour Market
— Instructional Design
— Comparative Analysis of Education Policy
— Management in Education
Key Activities
HSE Open Seminar on Education
Weekly
A series of weekly seminars that foregrounds topics central to modern educational research, policy, and practice
International Conference on Higher Education (ICHE)
October
A leading global venue to share the latest and most relevant research insights into higher education and beyond
Summer Schools
May to August
Sharpen your edge, unlock new research vistas, and build up your network with IOE International Summer Schools
News
Publications
-
Book
Human Agency and the Problem of Replicability in the Dynamic Neo-Structured World
Social reality is undergoing rapid transformations, giving rise to new challenges for both social theory and practice. One of these much-discussed challenges is the so-called replicability crisis, a notion that describes the failure of the social sciences and humanities to verify established research findings with new empirical investigations. In the related debates, it is argued that this “crisis” can be interpreted as a sign of the growing disconnect between, on one side, traditional perspectives on human nature and social structures that still dominate academic mainstream and, on the other side, the reality of an emerging new phase of societal evolution—neo-structuration, which emphasizes individual agency as a driver of development—in contrast to the well-known “structuration” argument by Antony Giddens, whereby human agency is seen as ontologically fused with the social structure, procuring stability of the latter rather than its transformation. Bridging the gap requires an interdisciplinary paradigm shift. This shift would involve moving away from considering human beings as changeless or predictably evolving subjects whose intentions and actions are determined both internally and externally by structures that supposedly follow a linear trajectory of “progress,” assuming the reproduction of the basic principles and forms of social interaction. Instead, in the context of intensifying neo-structuration, individual agency emerges as both an expression of the core of human nature and a catalyst for societal change, including the pressing social issues within the techno-material environment, which have radically changed in the first decades of the 21st century, especially after the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020. This presents a fundamentally new challenge for the social sciences and humanities: to develop methodological approaches and theoretical models capable of systematically analyzing the human capacity for creation and transformation—not just reproduction.
Under conditions of neo-structuration, individual agency causes transformations of both social structures and the agentic subjects themselves, which makes the crisis of replicability inevitable. The crisis itself is evidence of changes in social reality and human nature as the objects of research, not only the mere sign of the imperfection of measurements. Thus, the replicability crisis relates not only to the epistemology of science but also to the ontology of its subject matter.
Most important is to give an adequate theoretical and methodological account for the so-called strong agency, capable of a significant transformative impact on social environment. A special challenge refers to understanding the power of human agency in the context of technological advancement, including the opportunities related to artificial intelligence. Distinguishing between two types of such agency is necessary: on one hand, a conditionally “free” creative individual initiative, leveraging digital infrastructures as tools for forging new communities, transforming existing behavioral patterns, practices, and so on, and, on the other hand, a sphere of a “hybrid” strong agency, partially stimulated and augmented by targeted, customized systems of artificial intelligence’s recommendations, suggestions, navigation services, consultancy, and advice. Within these intersecting realms, the foremost theoretical and practical challenges emerge—particularly regarding the reconceptualization of human agency as a pivotal driver of institutional change under the condition of neo-structuration, which puts the problem of replicability in a principally new light.
Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Society, 2026.
-
Article
From Liberalism’s Shadow: The Conceptual Topography of Illiberalism Studies
The notion of illiberalism has become central to contemporary political debate, yet scholarly attempts to define it as an ideology remain fragmented and conceptually diffuse. This article empirically reconstructs the evolving architecture of illiberalism as a field of ideological inquiry. Drawing on a bibliometric analysis of 450 academic articles published between 1962 and 2025, it maps the co-occurrence of key concepts to show how the discourse has consolidated, diversified, and redefined itself over time. The resulting conceptual network reveals an intellectual field structured around four thematic domains linking debates on democracy, governance, the state, and ideology. The analysis identifies 2017 as a pivotal inflection point, marking a shift from dispersed theorization to a more unified discourse responding to real-world political crises and democratic erosion. Beyond tracing the field’s empirical contours, the study advances a theoretical claim: illiberalism operates less as a discrete ideology than as an ideological grammar internal to liberal democracy – one that performs its own critique by reconfiguring the boundaries of freedom, sovereignty, and legitimacy.
Political Studies Review. 2026.
-
Book chapter
‘Seven-gated Thebes’: Epic Tradition, Topography, and Evidence of Material Culture
The paper by Andrej Mozhajsky (Moscow) and Victoria Pichugina (Moscow) studies the topography of the ancient city of Thebes. Numerous stories about the mythological history of ancient Thebes were assembled in poetry and prose, e.g. about the bloody struggle for power among king Oedipus’ sons and the siege of the city that accompanied the struggle gained much popularity in Classical literature (Aeschylus, Euripides, Pausanias, Pseudo-Apollodorus, Statius, Hyginus, and others). Thanks to Aeschylus, who had turned to the Mycenaean topography and stated the presence of the city’s seven gates, Thebes appeared as a city with a specific spatial organization. Even though ancient authors list the names of these gates and attempt to locate them, the issue of whether the city had exactly seven gates still causes controversy among researchers. The epithet “7- gated” for Thebes, known since the creation of Homer’s Odyssey (11.260–5), presumably reflects the Kadmeia’s real fortifications, which remains date back to Mycenaean times. Unlike some other scholars, Mozhajsky and Pichugina argue that the Mycenaean Thebes indeed possessed seven gates and set out to prove this through the evidence of archaeological research, as well as the arguments considering the topography and the functions of the fortifications. Mozhajsky and Pichugina also find confirmation in some later literary sources that directly connect the fortification of the Kadmeia with the monuments of the Mycenaean period. For instance, Aeschylus (Sept. 526–528) associates the Kadmeia’s Northern Gate with the Amphion Hill, which, in their opinion, reflects the development of urban space in the Archaic period and the further transfer of ancient cultural meanings linked to topography into the classical period.
In bk.: Epic, Society, and Religion in the Ancient Near Eastern and Mediterranean Cultures. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2026. Ch. 10. P. 229-261.
-
Working paper
LLM Difficulty Prediction Across Three L2 Task Types and Two Examination Forms
Large language models (LLMs) have been proposed as a substitute for field trials in itemdifficulty estimation, but evidence about where they succeed is usually drawn from a single test form. We compare LLM difficulty predictions across three task types that make different language demands, grammar cloze, semantic cloze and reading comprehension, on two operational Grade 9 English examinations sat by the same cohort in China (1,199 and1,166 examinees). Three LLMs estimated difficulty for 60 MCQ items under the same standardized protocol. On Form 1, grammar cloze had the highest Pearson correlation for all three models; the Fisher-averaged correlations were .81 for grammar cloze and .34 for semantic cloze. On Form 2, reading had the highest correlation for all three models (Fisheraveraged .78), and the grammar–semantic difference was smaller and inconsistent in direction. With ten items per task type, a task-type advantage seen on one form needs testing on other forms before it is read as a property of the model.Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence in Measurement and Education Conference (AIME-Con). 2026.aimecon-wip.55. The Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2026
Contacts
Email us: ioe_hse@hse.ru
- Russia, 101000, 16 Potapovskiy Pereulok, Building 10.
- Underground Stations: Lubyanka, Turgenevskaya, Chistye Prudy, Sretenskiy Bulvar.
Office of IOE Director Evgeniy Terentev:
+7 (495) 623-52-49.
Graduate School of Education:
Svetlana Zhuchkova
szhuchkova@hse.ru
International Affairs Office:
Maksim Nikitin
Tel: + 7 (495) 772-95-90, ext. 22928
menikitin@hse.ru