The HSE Institute of Education is a leading interdisciplinary research centre specialising in the study of education systems, policies and practices. With a faculty of over 250 researchers and educators, including internationally renowned scholars, the Institute is a hub for high-impact research, teaching and policy engagement in education.
As part of its Strategy 2030, the Institute is developing into a world-class research school, focusing on understanding educational development and assessing the impact of educational policies. These priorities are reflected in the Institute’s key areas:
— Artificial Intelligence in Education
— Well-being in Education
— Education and the Labour Market
— Instructional Design
— Comparative Analysis of Education Policy
— Management in Education
Key Activities
HSE Open Seminar on Education
Weekly
A series of weekly seminars that foregrounds topics central to modern educational research, policy, and practice
International Conference on Higher Education (ICHE)
October
A leading global venue to share the latest and most relevant research insights into higher education and beyond
Summer Schools
May to August
Sharpen your edge, unlock new research vistas, and build up your network with IOE International Summer Schools
News
Publications
-
Book
Reconfiguring India’s Qualifications Architecture: TVET Reform from the National Skills Qualification Framework to the National Credit Framework
Under what institutional conditions do qualifications frameworks become trusted mechanisms for progression, mobility, and labour-market signalling? This paper starts with this question, and then examines the evolution of India’s qualifications architecture through the trajectory of the National Skills Qualification Framework (NSQF) and the emergence of the National Credit Framework (NCrF). More specifically, it addresses the question: why did the NSQF fall short of becoming a trusted qualifications framework, and to what extent can the NCrF overcome these limitations to create an integrated and credible qualifications system? The NSQF, introduced in 2013 as a learningoutcomes-based framework, sought to improve progression, portability, and comparability across education and training. However, its implementation became concentrated on short-duration skilling programmes and fragmented institutional arrangements, resulting in weak assessment credibility, limited labour-market recognition, and constrained learner progression. Drawing on policy documents, implementation evidence, and comparative institutional analysis, the paper argues that these shortcomings were structural rather than technical: qualifications frameworks cannot generate trust or mobility without robust institutions for assessment, certification, quality assurance, and recognition. Against this backdrop, the NCrF (2023), introduced under the National Education Policy 2020, represents a second-generation reform. By integrating school education, higher education, technical and vocational education and training (TVET), and experiential learning within a unified credit architecture, it has become the organising framework of India’s qualifications system. The paper shows that India has effectively moved from a single-framework model centred on the NSQF to a more complex architecture incorporating the NHEQF, NSEQF, and NCrF. It further argues that the alignment of the NSQF and NCrF has transformed India’s qualifications structure from what is commonly described as an eight-level framework into a 13-level progression system through the introduction of intermediary levels between Levels 2 and 7, with important implications for progression, comparability, and learner mobility. Drawing on international experience, the paper concludes that successful qualifications reform depends less on framework design than on trusted certification, visible progression pathways, and employer recognition. India’s next phase of reform must therefore shift from training expansion to assessment-based trust, progression-oriented qualifications, and stronger integration with domestic and international labour markets.
Vol. 18709. IZA Discussion Paper, 2026.
-
Article
The Body as an Algorithm: Digital Biopolitics, Embodiment, and Gendered Control in Menstrual Tracking Applications
This article examines how menstrual tracking apps reconfigure the body through digital biopolitics and feminist embodiment theory. Drawing on 14 semi-structured interviews with Russian women aged 18–30, it extends the concept of datafied embodiment to analyse how predictive analytics mediate bodily perception and reproductive practices. The study shows how apps construct a specific mode of bodily knowledge in which menstruation is framed as a manageable cycle visualized through charts, reminders, and symptom logs. While users often engage with apps as tools of emotional reassurance and health management, the findings reveal a paradox of control: menstrual apps offer autonomy and legitimacy to previously devalued bodily states, yet simultaneously reproduce normative ideals of femininity and reproductive responsibility through aesthetic and algorithmic cues. Privacy is negotiated situationally, with users treating cycle logs as relatively low-risk while drawing firmer boundaries around data linked to sexuality and reproductive decision-making. Within a post-Soviet context marked by menstrual taboo, a contested public status for feminism, and tightening reproductive politics, the article argues that FemTech’s promise of empowerment coexists with a tendency to make women individually responsible for monitoring and optimizing their bodies.
Journal of Gender Studies. 2026.
-
Book chapter
Science, innovation, education, culture, tourism, and sports
BRICS extends far beyond the realms of geopolitics and economics, encompassing a profound commitment to collaborative advancement in the sectors that most directly shape human potential and quality of life. Cooperation in science, innovation, education, culture, tourism, sport, and healthcare represents a strategic investment in social capital, serving as the essential element for sustainable development and people-centered progress. These domains are deeply interconnected; scientific breakthroughs fuel public health solutions, cultural exchanges foster the mutual understanding necessary for joint innovation, and educational mobility builds the human networks that underpin all other forms of cooperation. The group‘s multifaceted agenda in these areas is therefore not a peripheral concern, but a central pillar of its long-term vision to build a more inclusive and resilient future for its citizens.
In bk.: BRICS Cooperation Progress According to the BTTC Indicator System 2025/2026. M.: BRICS Expert Council – Russia, 2026. Ch. 5. P. 352-467.
-
Working paper
Explicit continuum scale format reduces the ceiling effect in self-report questionnaires comparing to Likert response format
This study presents a methodology for developing a new questionnaire format called explicit continuum scenario scales, in the example of a client focus questionnaire. Elements of the Rasch Guttman scenario scale methodology were used in its development. In three consequent studies, different aspects of the scale functioning were investigated. In Study 1, on the sample of 100 respondents, it was shown that the explicit continuum scale produces reliable results and helps avoid the ceiling effect shown in the Likert response format version of the client focus questionnaire. In Study 2, the scale was administered in a competition environment, in a sample of 735 people. Despite the positive shift of scores, the instrument shows excellent psychometric characteristics and still resists the ceiling effect. In Study 3, new items were included, and the scale was presented in an interactive format. In the sample of 65,000 university students, it demonstrated the robustness of its psychometrics characteristics including dimensionality. The results of the three studies show that the explicit continuum format has the advantage of the stable dimensionality similar to the expanded format and is promising for measurement in social sciences.Basic research program. WP BRP. National Research University Higher School of Economics, 2024
Contacts
Email us: ioe_hse@hse.ru
- Russia, 101000, 16 Potapovskiy Pereulok, Building 10.
- Underground Stations: Lubyanka, Turgenevskaya, Chistye Prudy, Sretenskiy Bulvar.
Office of IOE Director Evgeniy Terentev:
+7 (495) 623-52-49.
Graduate School of Education:
Svetlana Zhuchkova
szhuchkova@hse.ru
International Affairs Office:
Maksim Nikitin
Tel: + 7 (495) 772-95-90, ext. 22928
menikitin@hse.ru